projects / git / commit
? search:
summary | shortlog | log | commit | commitdiff | tree
(parent: e57cb01) | patch
Documentation: teach stash/pop workflow instead of stash/apply
authorThomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Thu, 28 May 2009 09:40:15 +0000 (11:40 +0200)
committerJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fri, 29 May 2009 06:52:25 +0000 (23:52 -0700)
commit7b8988e113b44b9a2d806dde6161c133750c14e5
tree0a83de87c1d719fbe5e640deb8b41176f75a6802tree | snapshot
parente57cb0158209ece040a4b873064504efd7d2ec0ecommit | diff
Documentation: teach stash/pop workflow instead of stash/apply

Recent discussion on the list showed some comments in favour of a
stash/pop workflow:

  http://marc.info/?l=git&m=124234911423358&w=2
  http://marc.info/?l=git&m=124235348327711&w=2

Change the stash documentation and examples to document pop in its own
right (and apply in terms of pop), and use stash/pop in the examples.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Documentation/git-stash.txt diff | blob | blame | history
Documentation/user-manual.txt diff | blob | blame | history
Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.