_NB! this page has been refactored, hopefully it is clearer now_ _I propose putting discussion posts somewhere in the vincity of the secttion Individual reStructuredText Issues_ ## Design ## **Goal** To be able to use rst as a first-class markup language in ikiwiki. I think most believe this is almost impossible (ikiwiki is built around markdown). ## Wikilinks ## **WikiLinks**, first and foremost, are needed for a wiki. rST already allows specifying absolue and relative URL links, and relative links can be used to tie together wiki of rst documents. 1. Below are links to a small, working implementation for resolving undefined rST references using ikiwiki's mechanism. This is **Proposal 1** for rst WikiLinks. 2. Looking over at rST-using systems such as trac and MoinMoin; I think it would be wiser to implement wikilinks by the `:role:` mechanism, together with allowing a custom URL scheme to point to wiki links. This is **Proposal 2**. This is a simple wiki page, with :wiki:`WikiLinks` and other_ links .. _other: wiki:wikilink We can get rid of the role part as well for WikiLinks:: .. default-role:: wiki Enables `WikiLinks` but does not impact references such as ``other`` This can be made the default for ikiwiki. Benefits of using a `:role:` and a `wiki: page/subpage` URL scheme are following: 1. rST documents taken out of the context (the wiki) will not fail as bad as if they have lots of Proposal-1 links: They look just the same as valid references, and you have to edit them all. In contrast, should the `:wiki:` role disappear, one line is enough to redefined it and silence all the warnings for the document: .. role:: wiki (title) ### Implementation ### Implementation of Proposal-2 wikilinks are in the branch [rst-wikilinks][rst-wl] This is a simple wiki page, with :wiki:`WikiLinks` and |named| links .. |named| wiki:: Some Page We can get rid of the role part as well for WikiLinks:: .. default-role:: wiki Enables `WikiLinks` but does not impact references such as ``named`` This can be made the default for ikiwiki. [rst-wl]: http://github.com/engla/ikiwiki/commits/rst-wikilinks On top of **rst-wikilinks** is [rst-customize][rst-custom] which adds two power user features: Global (python) file to read in custom directives (unsafe), and a wikifile as "header" file for all parsed .rst files (safe, but disruptive since all .rst depend on it). Well, the customizations have to be picked and chosen from this, but at least the global python file can be very convenient. Some rst-custom [examples are here](http://kaizer.se/wiki/rst_examples/) [rst-custom]: http://github.com/engla/ikiwiki/commits/rst-customize **What is missing?** links to nonexistant pages are not resolved. Perhaps the "link resolver" part should use Ikiwiki's htmllink instead of its simple subsitutions. ## Directives ## Now **Directives**: As it is now, ikiwiki goes though (roughly): filter, preprocess, htmlize, format as major stages of content transformation. rST has major problems to work with any HTML that enters the picture before it. 1. Formatting rST in `htmlize` (as is done now): Raw html can be escaped by raw blocks: .. raw:: html \[[!inline and do stuff]] (This can be simplified to alias the above as `.. ikiwiki::`) This escape method works, if ikwiki can be persuaded to maintain the indent when inserting html, so that it stays inside the raw block. 2. Formatting rST in `filter` (idea) 1. rST does not have to see any HTML (raw not needed) 2. rST directives can alias ikiwiki syntax: ..ikiwiki:: inline pages= ... 3. Using rST directives as ikiwiki directives can be complicated; but rST directives allow a direct line (after :: on first line), an option list, and a content block. ### Implementation ### Preserving indents in the preprocessor are in branch [pproc-indent][ppi] (These simple patches come with a warning: _Those are the first lines of Perl I've ever written!_) [ppi]: http://github.com/engla/ikiwiki/commits/pproc-indent ## Discussion ## I guess you (or someone) has been through this before and knows why it simply won't work. But I hoped there was something original in the above; and I know there are wiki installations where rST works. --ulrik **Individual reStructuredText Issues** * We resolve rST links without definition, we don't help resolving defined relative links, so we don't support specifying link name and target separately. * Resolved by |replacement| links with the wiki:: directive. **A first implementation: Resolving unmatched links** I have a working minimal implementation letting the rst renderer resolve undefined native rST links to ikiwiki pages. I have posted it as one patch at: Preview commit: http://github.com/engla/ikiwiki/commit/486fd79e520da1d462f00f40e7a90ab07e9c6fdf Repository: git://github.com/engla/ikiwiki.git Design issues of the patch: The page is rST-parsed once in 'scan' and once in 'htmlize' (the first to generate backlinks). Can the parse output be safely reused? > The page content fed to htmlize may be different than that fed to scan, > as directives can change the content. If you cached the input and output > at scan time, you could reuse the cached data at htmlize time for inputs > that are the same -- but that could be a very big cache! --[[Joey]] >> I would propose using a simple heuristic: If you see \[[ anywhere on the >> page, don't cache it. It would be an effective cache for pure-rst wikis >> (without any ikiwiki directives or wikilinks). >> However, I think that if the cache does not work for a big load, it should >> not work at all; small loads are small so they don't matter. --ulrik