From 0760db7368044c0c7aad79e97a87f3af4d9c7d6e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 16:36:38 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] cannot reproduce (again) --- ...nts_are_listed_by___33__map_or___33__inline.mdwn | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/bugs/Not_all_comments_are_listed_by___33__map_or___33__inline.mdwn b/doc/bugs/Not_all_comments_are_listed_by___33__map_or___33__inline.mdwn index 08953db5d..bfdc8d046 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/Not_all_comments_are_listed_by___33__map_or___33__inline.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/Not_all_comments_are_listed_by___33__map_or___33__inline.mdwn @@ -9,6 +9,16 @@ While working on our forum I was surprised to see that some of the comments were >> recent items » criteria: >> --sajolida +>>> Of course this is a moving target, so I checked out +>>> 4a787aecb142f346190ddaef59938799818c964b, which is from the same day +>>> the above was written.. The comments in question appeared in +>>> the rss feed when I ran `ikiwiki -setup ikiwiki.setup -gettime` +>>> (after configuring the setup file to use git and rss and setting +>>> `gitorigin_branch: ''`) +>>> +>>> So I suppose I'd need a testcase in a tarball to reproduce +>>> any problem. --[[Joey]] + Then I found out that a map directive such as `!map pages="forum/* or comment(forum/*)"` was bringing a weird result too. The output is a map with quite a few broken links. @@ -20,6 +30,9 @@ with quite a few broken links. >> So I don't understand why 90 % of the comments are linked well and 10 % >> are broken links. Why does this map behave differently for only a few comments? --sajolida +>>> I checked the first 50% or so of the comments, and every one was a +>>> broken link. --[[Joey]] + Plus, some broken links in the map do match the comments missing on the RSS feed but some others do not. Unfortunately, I couldn't find an obvious pattern for this failure. -- 2.32.0.93.g670b81a890