From 29f111c47c2bcae941bb3d604a95c64b7c374255 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://id.koumbit.net/anarcat" Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:40:43 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] why not try lucene too? --- doc/todo/lucene_search_engine.mdwn | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/lucene_search_engine.mdwn diff --git a/doc/todo/lucene_search_engine.mdwn b/doc/todo/lucene_search_engine.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 000000000..694c81c4c --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/lucene_search_engine.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +There are [some issue](http://www.branchable.com/bugs/Exception:_Cannot_open_tables_at_consistent_revisions_at___47__usr__47__lib__47__perl5__47__Search__47__Xapian__47__WritableDatabase.pm_line_41./#comment-c159ea3f9be35fcd9ed0eeedb162e816) with the current search engine. Sometimes the database gets corrupted and it's not very good at weighting say, the title against the content. In [[different_search_engine]], there was the idea of using Lucene - is there any reason why we should have both, or at least let lucene live in contrib? -- 2.32.0.93.g670b81a890