From 61a36de432c58a8d7703b1ecc5d5704981e10e2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joey Hess <joey@gnu.kitenet.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 15:40:18 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] closures

---
 doc/bugs/transitive_dependencies.mdwn | 2 +-
 doc/todo/dependency_types.mdwn        | 9 ++++-----
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/bugs/transitive_dependencies.mdwn b/doc/bugs/transitive_dependencies.mdwn
index 9586bc9b0..0a2e9ec28 100644
--- a/doc/bugs/transitive_dependencies.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/transitive_dependencies.mdwn
@@ -65,4 +65,4 @@ Downsides here:
   modification to plugins/brokenlinks causes an unnecessary update of
   plugins, and could be solved by adding more dependency types.)
 
---[[Joey]] 
+[[done]] --[[Joey]] 
diff --git a/doc/todo/dependency_types.mdwn b/doc/todo/dependency_types.mdwn
index f13f1448e..f46a6a7c6 100644
--- a/doc/todo/dependency_types.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/dependency_types.mdwn
@@ -162,14 +162,13 @@ Link dependencies:
 
 * `add_depends($page, $spec, links => 1, presence => 1)`
   adds a links + presence dependency.
-* `refresh` only rebuilds a page with a links dependency if
-  pages matched by the pagespec gain or lose links. (What the link
-  actually points to may change independent of this, due to changes
-  elsewhere, without it firing.)
+* Use backlinks change code to detect changes to link dependencies too.
 * So, brokenlinks can fire whenever any links in any of the
   pages it's tracking change, or when pages are added or
   removed.
 
 TODO: How to determine if a pagespec is valid to be used with a links
 dependency? Use the same simple pagespecs that are valid for presence
-dependencies?
+dependencies? Seems ok.
+
+[[done]]
-- 
2.32.0.93.g670b81a890