From 61a36de432c58a8d7703b1ecc5d5704981e10e2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 15:40:18 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] closures --- doc/bugs/transitive_dependencies.mdwn | 2 +- doc/todo/dependency_types.mdwn | 9 ++++----- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/bugs/transitive_dependencies.mdwn b/doc/bugs/transitive_dependencies.mdwn index 9586bc9b0..0a2e9ec28 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/transitive_dependencies.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/transitive_dependencies.mdwn @@ -65,4 +65,4 @@ Downsides here: modification to plugins/brokenlinks causes an unnecessary update of plugins, and could be solved by adding more dependency types.) ---[[Joey]] +[[done]] --[[Joey]] diff --git a/doc/todo/dependency_types.mdwn b/doc/todo/dependency_types.mdwn index f13f1448e..f46a6a7c6 100644 --- a/doc/todo/dependency_types.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/dependency_types.mdwn @@ -162,14 +162,13 @@ Link dependencies: * `add_depends($page, $spec, links => 1, presence => 1)` adds a links + presence dependency. -* `refresh` only rebuilds a page with a links dependency if - pages matched by the pagespec gain or lose links. (What the link - actually points to may change independent of this, due to changes - elsewhere, without it firing.) +* Use backlinks change code to detect changes to link dependencies too. * So, brokenlinks can fire whenever any links in any of the pages it's tracking change, or when pages are added or removed. TODO: How to determine if a pagespec is valid to be used with a links dependency? Use the same simple pagespecs that are valid for presence -dependencies? +dependencies? Seems ok. + +[[done]] -- 2.32.0.93.g670b81a890