From 7272938a116b2c87f8c34057034b5f4e9244cdf8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jogo Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:44:12 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] --- doc/plugins/lockedit/discussion.mdwn | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/plugins/lockedit/discussion.mdwn b/doc/plugins/lockedit/discussion.mdwn index 8a08edaad..867fc6a51 100644 --- a/doc/plugins/lockedit/discussion.mdwn +++ b/doc/plugins/lockedit/discussion.mdwn @@ -6,3 +6,13 @@ calls needsignin ]. > page is that you are not logged in. And without the jump to logging the > user in, there is no way for the user to log in, without navigating away > from the page they were trying to edit. --[[Joey]] + +>> Ok, but the problem is that when you don't want any signin form you end up +>> with a lone login button. That might happend if you lock pages only on IP +>> adresses, if you use another cookie from another webapp... + +>> That happends to me and I had to reimplement lockedit in my private auth +>> plugin. + +>> Perhaps you could return undef on that case and let another plugin do the +>> needsignin call ? -- [[Jogo]] -- 2.32.0.93.g670b81a890