From dd75b61d9332e50364f97fc04179ab895bfc2ef8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:15:58 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] response --- .../svn_commit_failures_interpreted_as_merge_conflicts.mdwn | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/bugs/svn_commit_failures_interpreted_as_merge_conflicts.mdwn b/doc/bugs/svn_commit_failures_interpreted_as_merge_conflicts.mdwn index 09753b4ee..0c9bce4b9 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/svn_commit_failures_interpreted_as_merge_conflicts.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/svn_commit_failures_interpreted_as_merge_conflicts.mdwn @@ -13,3 +13,9 @@ However there are no merge conflict markers in the page. My apache error log say [Fri Apr 30 16:43:57 2010] [error] [client 10.64.64.42] svn: Authorization failed, referer: https://unixwiki.ncl.ac.uk/ikiwiki.cgi -- [[Jon]] + +> Only way for this to be improved would be for the svn plugin to +> explicitly check the file for conflict markers. I guess it could +> change the error message then, but the actual behavior of putting the +> changed file back in the editor so the user can recommit is about right +> as far as error recovery goes. --[[Joey]] -- 2.32.0.93.g670b81a890