From 5421ae0153b4ba0469967cfd8de96144e3bf3979 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pavel Emelyanov Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:51:45 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] scm: fix scm_fp_list->list initialization made in wrong place This is the next page of the scm recursion story (the commit f8d570a4 net: Fix recursive descent in __scm_destroy()). In function scm_fp_dup(), the INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fpl->list) of newly created fpl is done *before* the subsequent memcpy from the old structure and thus the freshly initialized list is overwritten. But that's OK, since this initialization is not required at all, since the fpl->list is list_add-ed at the destruction time in any case (and is unused in other code), so I propose to drop both initializations, rather than moving it after the memcpy. Please, correct me if I miss something significant. Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/core/scm.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/core/scm.c b/net/core/scm.c index ab242cc1acc..b12303dd39d 100644 --- a/net/core/scm.c +++ b/net/core/scm.c @@ -75,7 +75,6 @@ static int scm_fp_copy(struct cmsghdr *cmsg, struct scm_fp_list **fplp) if (!fpl) return -ENOMEM; *fplp = fpl; - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fpl->list); fpl->count = 0; } fpp = &fpl->fp[fpl->count]; @@ -301,7 +300,6 @@ struct scm_fp_list *scm_fp_dup(struct scm_fp_list *fpl) new_fpl = kmalloc(sizeof(*fpl), GFP_KERNEL); if (new_fpl) { - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new_fpl->list); for (i=fpl->count-1; i>=0; i--) get_file(fpl->fp[i]); memcpy(new_fpl, fpl, sizeof(*fpl)); -- 2.32.0.93.g670b81a890