1 Memory Resource Controller
3 NOTE: The Memory Resource Controller has been generically been referred
4 to as the memory controller in this document. Do not confuse memory controller
5 used here with the memory controller that is used in hardware.
9 a. Enable control of both RSS (mapped) and Page Cache (unmapped) pages
10 b. The infrastructure allows easy addition of other types of memory to control
11 c. Provides *zero overhead* for non memory controller users
12 d. Provides a double LRU: global memory pressure causes reclaim from the
13 global LRU; a cgroup on hitting a limit, reclaims from the per
16 NOTE: Swap Cache (unmapped) is not accounted now.
18 Benefits and Purpose of the memory controller
20 The memory controller isolates the memory behaviour of a group of tasks
21 from the rest of the system. The article on LWN [12] mentions some probable
22 uses of the memory controller. The memory controller can be used to
24 a. Isolate an application or a group of applications
25 Memory hungry applications can be isolated and limited to a smaller
27 b. Create a cgroup with limited amount of memory, this can be used
28 as a good alternative to booting with mem=XXXX.
29 c. Virtualization solutions can control the amount of memory they want
30 to assign to a virtual machine instance.
31 d. A CD/DVD burner could control the amount of memory used by the
32 rest of the system to ensure that burning does not fail due to lack
34 e. There are several other use cases, find one or use the controller just
35 for fun (to learn and hack on the VM subsystem).
39 The memory controller has a long history. A request for comments for the memory
40 controller was posted by Balbir Singh [1]. At the time the RFC was posted
41 there were several implementations for memory control. The goal of the
42 RFC was to build consensus and agreement for the minimal features required
43 for memory control. The first RSS controller was posted by Balbir Singh[2]
44 in Feb 2007. Pavel Emelianov [3][4][5] has since posted three versions of the
45 RSS controller. At OLS, at the resource management BoF, everyone suggested
46 that we handle both page cache and RSS together. Another request was raised
47 to allow user space handling of OOM. The current memory controller is
48 at version 6; it combines both mapped (RSS) and unmapped Page
53 Memory is a unique resource in the sense that it is present in a limited
54 amount. If a task requires a lot of CPU processing, the task can spread
55 its processing over a period of hours, days, months or years, but with
56 memory, the same physical memory needs to be reused to accomplish the task.
58 The memory controller implementation has been divided into phases. These
62 2. mlock(2) controller
63 3. Kernel user memory accounting and slab control
64 4. user mappings length controller
66 The memory controller is the first controller developed.
70 The core of the design is a counter called the res_counter. The res_counter
71 tracks the current memory usage and limit of the group of processes associated
72 with the controller. Each cgroup has a memory controller specific data
73 structure (mem_cgroup) associated with it.
77 +--------------------+
80 +--------------------+
83 +---------------+ | +---------------+
84 | mm_struct | |.... | mm_struct |
86 +---------------+ | +---------------+
90 +---------------+ +------+--------+
91 | page +----------> page_cgroup|
93 +---------------+ +---------------+
95 (Figure 1: Hierarchy of Accounting)
98 Figure 1 shows the important aspects of the controller
100 1. Accounting happens per cgroup
101 2. Each mm_struct knows about which cgroup it belongs to
102 3. Each page has a pointer to the page_cgroup, which in turn knows the
105 The accounting is done as follows: mem_cgroup_charge() is invoked to setup
106 the necessary data structures and check if the cgroup that is being charged
107 is over its limit. If it is then reclaim is invoked on the cgroup.
108 More details can be found in the reclaim section of this document.
109 If everything goes well, a page meta-data-structure called page_cgroup is
110 allocated and associated with the page. This routine also adds the page to
113 2.2.1 Accounting details
115 All mapped anon pages (RSS) and cache pages (Page Cache) are accounted.
116 (some pages which never be reclaimable and will not be on global LRU
117 are not accounted. we just accounts pages under usual vm management.)
119 RSS pages are accounted at page_fault unless they've already been accounted
120 for earlier. A file page will be accounted for as Page Cache when it's
121 inserted into inode (radix-tree). While it's mapped into the page tables of
122 processes, duplicate accounting is carefully avoided.
124 A RSS page is unaccounted when it's fully unmapped. A PageCache page is
125 unaccounted when it's removed from radix-tree.
127 At page migration, accounting information is kept.
129 Note: we just account pages-on-lru because our purpose is to control amount
130 of used pages. not-on-lru pages are tend to be out-of-control from vm view.
132 2.3 Shared Page Accounting
134 Shared pages are accounted on the basis of the first touch approach. The
135 cgroup that first touches a page is accounted for the page. The principle
136 behind this approach is that a cgroup that aggressively uses a shared
137 page will eventually get charged for it (once it is uncharged from
138 the cgroup that brought it in -- this will happen on memory pressure).
140 Exception: If CONFIG_CGROUP_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP is not used..
141 When you do swapoff and make swapped-out pages of shmem(tmpfs) to
142 be backed into memory in force, charges for pages are accounted against the
143 caller of swapoff rather than the users of shmem.
146 2.4 Swap Extension (CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP)
147 Swap Extension allows you to record charge for swap. A swapped-in page is
148 charged back to original page allocator if possible.
150 When swap is accounted, following files are added.
151 - memory.memsw.usage_in_bytes.
152 - memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes.
154 usage of mem+swap is limited by memsw.limit_in_bytes.
156 Note: why 'mem+swap' rather than swap.
157 The global LRU(kswapd) can swap out arbitrary pages. Swap-out means
158 to move account from memory to swap...there is no change in usage of
161 In other words, when we want to limit the usage of swap without affecting
162 global LRU, mem+swap limit is better than just limiting swap from OS point
167 Each cgroup maintains a per cgroup LRU that consists of an active
168 and inactive list. When a cgroup goes over its limit, we first try
169 to reclaim memory from the cgroup so as to make space for the new
170 pages that the cgroup has touched. If the reclaim is unsuccessful,
171 an OOM routine is invoked to select and kill the bulkiest task in the
174 The reclaim algorithm has not been modified for cgroups, except that
175 pages that are selected for reclaiming come from the per cgroup LRU
180 The memory controller uses the following hierarchy
182 1. zone->lru_lock is used for selecting pages to be isolated
183 2. mem->per_zone->lru_lock protects the per cgroup LRU (per zone)
184 3. lock_page_cgroup() is used to protect page->page_cgroup
190 a. Enable CONFIG_CGROUPS
191 b. Enable CONFIG_RESOURCE_COUNTERS
192 c. Enable CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
194 1. Prepare the cgroups
196 # mount -t cgroup none /cgroups -o memory
198 2. Make the new group and move bash into it
200 # echo $$ > /cgroups/0/tasks
202 Since now we're in the 0 cgroup,
203 We can alter the memory limit:
204 # echo 4M > /cgroups/0/memory.limit_in_bytes
206 NOTE: We can use a suffix (k, K, m, M, g or G) to indicate values in kilo,
209 # cat /cgroups/0/memory.limit_in_bytes
212 NOTE: The interface has now changed to display the usage in bytes
215 We can check the usage:
216 # cat /cgroups/0/memory.usage_in_bytes
219 A successful write to this file does not guarantee a successful set of
220 this limit to the value written into the file. This can be due to a
221 number of factors, such as rounding up to page boundaries or the total
222 availability of memory on the system. The user is required to re-read
223 this file after a write to guarantee the value committed by the kernel.
225 # echo 1 > memory.limit_in_bytes
226 # cat memory.limit_in_bytes
229 The memory.failcnt field gives the number of times that the cgroup limit was
232 The memory.stat file gives accounting information. Now, the number of
233 caches, RSS and Active pages/Inactive pages are shown.
237 Balbir posted lmbench, AIM9, LTP and vmmstress results [10] and [11].
238 Apart from that v6 has been tested with several applications and regular
239 daily use. The controller has also been tested on the PPC64, x86_64 and
244 Sometimes a user might find that the application under a cgroup is
245 terminated. There are several causes for this:
247 1. The cgroup limit is too low (just too low to do anything useful)
248 2. The user is using anonymous memory and swap is turned off or too low
250 A sync followed by echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches will help get rid of
251 some of the pages cached in the cgroup (page cache pages).
255 When a task migrates from one cgroup to another, it's charge is not
256 carried forward. The pages allocated from the original cgroup still
257 remain charged to it, the charge is dropped when the page is freed or
260 4.3 Removing a cgroup
262 A cgroup can be removed by rmdir, but as discussed in sections 4.1 and 4.2, a
263 cgroup might have some charge associated with it, even though all
264 tasks have migrated away from it.
265 Such charges are freed(at default) or moved to its parent. When moved,
266 both of RSS and CACHES are moved to parent.
267 If both of them are busy, rmdir() returns -EBUSY. See 5.1 Also.
269 Charges recorded in swap information is not updated at removal of cgroup.
270 Recorded information is discarded and a cgroup which uses swap (swapcache)
271 will be charged as a new owner of it.
277 memory.force_empty interface is provided to make cgroup's memory usage empty.
278 You can use this interface only when the cgroup has no tasks.
279 When writing anything to this
281 # echo 0 > memory.force_empty
283 Almost all pages tracked by this memcg will be unmapped and freed. Some of
284 pages cannot be freed because it's locked or in-use. Such pages are moved
285 to parent and this cgroup will be empty. But this may return -EBUSY in
288 Typical use case of this interface is that calling this before rmdir().
289 Because rmdir() moves all pages to parent, some out-of-use page caches can be
290 moved to the parent. If you want to avoid that, force_empty will be useful.
293 memory.stat file includes following statistics (now)
294 cache - # of pages from page-cache and shmem.
295 rss - # of pages from anonymous memory.
296 pgpgin - # of event of charging
297 pgpgout - # of event of uncharging
298 active_anon - # of pages on active lru of anon, shmem.
299 inactive_anon - # of pages on active lru of anon, shmem
300 active_file - # of pages on active lru of file-cache
301 inactive_file - # of pages on inactive lru of file cache
302 unevictable - # of pages cannot be reclaimed.(mlocked etc)
304 Below is depend on CONFIG_DEBUG_VM.
305 inactive_ratio - VM inernal parameter. (see mm/page_alloc.c)
306 recent_rotated_anon - VM internal parameter. (see mm/vmscan.c)
307 recent_rotated_file - VM internal parameter. (see mm/vmscan.c)
308 recent_scanned_anon - VM internal parameter. (see mm/vmscan.c)
309 recent_scanned_file - VM internal parameter. (see mm/vmscan.c)
312 recent_rotated means recent frequency of lru rotation.
313 recent_scanned means recent # of scans to lru.
314 showing for better debug please see the code for meanings.
318 Similar to /proc/sys/vm/swappiness, but affecting a hierarchy of groups only.
320 Following cgroup's swapiness can't be changed.
321 - root cgroup (uses /proc/sys/vm/swappiness).
322 - a cgroup which uses hierarchy and it has child cgroup.
323 - a cgroup which uses hierarchy and not the root of hierarchy.
328 The memory controller supports a deep hierarchy and hierarchical accounting.
329 The hierarchy is created by creating the appropriate cgroups in the
330 cgroup filesystem. Consider for example, the following cgroup filesystem
341 In the diagram above, with hierarchical accounting enabled, all memory
342 usage of e, is accounted to its ancestors up until the root (i.e, c and root),
343 that has memory.use_hierarchy enabled. If one of the ancestors goes over its
344 limit, the reclaim algorithm reclaims from the tasks in the ancestor and the
345 children of the ancestor.
347 6.1 Enabling hierarchical accounting and reclaim
349 The memory controller by default disables the hierarchy feature. Support
350 can be enabled by writing 1 to memory.use_hierarchy file of the root cgroup
352 # echo 1 > memory.use_hierarchy
354 The feature can be disabled by
356 # echo 0 > memory.use_hierarchy
358 NOTE1: Enabling/disabling will fail if the cgroup already has other
359 cgroups created below it.
361 NOTE2: This feature can be enabled/disabled per subtree.
365 1. Add support for accounting huge pages (as a separate controller)
366 2. Make per-cgroup scanner reclaim not-shared pages first
367 3. Teach controller to account for shared-pages
368 4. Start reclamation in the background when the limit is
369 not yet hit but the usage is getting closer
373 Overall, the memory controller has been a stable controller and has been
374 commented and discussed quite extensively in the community.
378 1. Singh, Balbir. RFC: Memory Controller, http://lwn.net/Articles/206697/
379 2. Singh, Balbir. Memory Controller (RSS Control),
380 http://lwn.net/Articles/222762/
381 3. Emelianov, Pavel. Resource controllers based on process cgroups
382 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/6/198
383 4. Emelianov, Pavel. RSS controller based on process cgroups (v2)
384 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/9/78
385 5. Emelianov, Pavel. RSS controller based on process cgroups (v3)
386 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/30/244
387 6. Menage, Paul. Control Groups v10, http://lwn.net/Articles/236032/
388 7. Vaidyanathan, Srinivasan, Control Groups: Pagecache accounting and control
389 subsystem (v3), http://lwn.net/Articles/235534/
390 8. Singh, Balbir. RSS controller v2 test results (lmbench),
391 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/17/232
392 9. Singh, Balbir. RSS controller v2 AIM9 results
393 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/18/1
394 10. Singh, Balbir. Memory controller v6 test results,
395 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/19/36
396 11. Singh, Balbir. Memory controller introduction (v6),
397 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/17/69
398 12. Corbet, Jonathan, Controlling memory use in cgroups,
399 http://lwn.net/Articles/243795/