Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris...
[linux-2.6] / include / asm-v850 / unaligned.h
1 /*
2  * include/asm-v850/unaligned.h -- Unaligned memory access
3  *
4  *  Copyright (C) 2001  NEC Corporation
5  *  Copyright (C) 2001  Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
6  *
7  * This file is subject to the terms and conditions of the GNU General
8  * Public License.  See the file COPYING in the main directory of this
9  * archive for more details.
10  *
11  * This file is a copy of the arm version, include/asm-arm/unaligned.h
12  *
13  * Note that some v850 chips support unaligned access, but it seems too
14  * annoying to use.
15  */
16
17 #ifndef __V850_UNALIGNED_H__
18 #define __V850_UNALIGNED_H__
19
20 #include <asm/types.h>
21
22 extern int __bug_unaligned_x(void *ptr);
23
24 /*
25  * What is the most efficient way of loading/storing an unaligned value?
26  *
27  * That is the subject of this file.  Efficiency here is defined as
28  * minimum code size with minimum register usage for the common cases.
29  * It is currently not believed that long longs are common, so we
30  * trade efficiency for the chars, shorts and longs against the long
31  * longs.
32  *
33  * Current stats with gcc 2.7.2.2 for these functions:
34  *
35  *      ptrsize get:    code    regs    put:    code    regs
36  *      1               1       1               1       2
37  *      2               3       2               3       2
38  *      4               7       3               7       3
39  *      8               20      6               16      6
40  *
41  * gcc 2.95.1 seems to code differently:
42  *
43  *      ptrsize get:    code    regs    put:    code    regs
44  *      1               1       1               1       2
45  *      2               3       2               3       2
46  *      4               7       4               7       4
47  *      8               19      8               15      6
48  *
49  * which may or may not be more efficient (depending upon whether
50  * you can afford the extra registers).  Hopefully the gcc 2.95
51  * is inteligent enough to decide if it is better to use the
52  * extra register, but evidence so far seems to suggest otherwise.
53  *
54  * Unfortunately, gcc is not able to optimise the high word
55  * out of long long >> 32, or the low word from long long << 32
56  */
57
58 #define __get_unaligned_2(__p)                                  \
59         (__p[0] | __p[1] << 8)
60
61 #define __get_unaligned_4(__p)                                  \
62         (__p[0] | __p[1] << 8 | __p[2] << 16 | __p[3] << 24)
63
64 #define get_unaligned(ptr)                                      \
65         ({                                                      \
66                 __typeof__(*(ptr)) __v;                         \
67                 __u8 *__p = (__u8 *)(ptr);                      \
68                 switch (sizeof(*(ptr))) {                       \
69                 case 1: __v = *(ptr);                   break;  \
70                 case 2: __v = __get_unaligned_2(__p);   break;  \
71                 case 4: __v = __get_unaligned_4(__p);   break;  \
72                 case 8: {                                       \
73                                 unsigned int __v1, __v2;        \
74                                 __v2 = __get_unaligned_4((__p+4)); \
75                                 __v1 = __get_unaligned_4(__p);  \
76                                 __v = ((unsigned long long)__v2 << 32 | __v1);  \
77                         }                                       \
78                         break;                                  \
79                 default: __v = __bug_unaligned_x(__p);  break;  \
80                 }                                               \
81                 __v;                                            \
82         })
83
84
85 static inline void __put_unaligned_2(__u32 __v, register __u8 *__p)
86 {
87         *__p++ = __v;
88         *__p++ = __v >> 8;
89 }
90
91 static inline void __put_unaligned_4(__u32 __v, register __u8 *__p)
92 {
93         __put_unaligned_2(__v >> 16, __p + 2);
94         __put_unaligned_2(__v, __p);
95 }
96
97 static inline void __put_unaligned_8(const unsigned long long __v, register __u8 *__p)
98 {
99         /*
100          * tradeoff: 8 bytes of stack for all unaligned puts (2
101          * instructions), or an extra register in the long long
102          * case - go for the extra register.
103          */
104         __put_unaligned_4(__v >> 32, __p+4);
105         __put_unaligned_4(__v, __p);
106 }
107
108 /*
109  * Try to store an unaligned value as efficiently as possible.
110  */
111 #define put_unaligned(val,ptr)                                  \
112         ({                                                      \
113                 switch (sizeof(*(ptr))) {                       \
114                 case 1:                                         \
115                         *(ptr) = (val);                         \
116                         break;                                  \
117                 case 2: __put_unaligned_2((val),(__u8 *)(ptr)); \
118                         break;                                  \
119                 case 4: __put_unaligned_4((val),(__u8 *)(ptr)); \
120                         break;                                  \
121                 case 8: __put_unaligned_8((val),(__u8 *)(ptr)); \
122                         break;                                  \
123                 default: __bug_unaligned_x(ptr);                \
124                         break;                                  \
125                 }                                               \
126                 (void) 0;                                       \
127         })
128
129
130 #endif /* __V850_UNALIGNED_H__ */